Wilder powers: Morality and animality in tales of war and terror

Jean M. Langford

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Among the figures of animality evoked in narratives of violence are the "beast" who perpetrates acts of brutality and the debased creature who is subjected to captivity, forced labor, or slaughter. Yet a third figure of animality appears in the stories of animistically inclined emigrants who survived war and terror in Laos or Cambodia: the wild animal as transmigrated ancestor or capriciously sympathetic spirit who offers a powerful if unpredictable source of protection. Encounters with fantastic animals implicitly question the relationship between humanity and animality that often prevails in accounts of violence, opening possibilities for a zoopolitics of morality and animality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)223-244
Number of pages22
JournalHAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2013

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Jean M. Langford.

Keywords

  • Animality
  • Biopolitics
  • Magic
  • Southeast Asia
  • Violence
  • Zoopolitics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Wilder powers: Morality and animality in tales of war and terror'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this