TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysis of self-report and biochemically verified tobacco abstinence outcomes with missing data
T2 - A sensitivity analysis using two-stage imputation
AU - Zhang, Yiwen
AU - Luo, Xianghua
AU - Le, Chap T.
AU - Ahluwalia, Jasjit S.
AU - Thomas, Janet L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s).
PY - 2018/12/18
Y1 - 2018/12/18
N2 - Background: Missing data are common in tobacco studies. It is well known that from the observed data alone, it is impossible to distinguish between missing mechanisms such as missing at random (MAR) and missing not at random (MNAR). In this paper, we propose a sensitivity analysis method to accommodate different missing mechanisms in cessation outcomes determined by self-report and urine validation results. Methods: We propose a two-stage imputation procedure, allowing survey and urine data to be missing under different mechanisms. The motivating data were from a tobacco cessation trial examining the effects of the extended vs. standard Quit and Win contests and counseling vs. no counseling under a 2-by-2 factorial design. The primary outcome was 6-month biochemically verified tobacco abstinence. Results: Our proposed method covers a wide spectrum of missing scenarios, including the widely adopted "missing = smoking" imputation by assuming a perfect smoking-missing correlation (an extreme case of MNAR), the MAR case by assuming a zero smoking-missing correlation, and many more in between. The analysis of the data example shows that the estimated effects of the studied interventions are sensitive to the different missing assumptions on the survey and urine data. Conclusions: Sensitivity analysis has played a crucial role in assessing the robustness of the findings in clinical trials with missing data. The proposed method provides an effective tool for analyzing missing data introduced at two different stages of outcome assessment, the self-report and validation time. Our methods are applicable to trials studying biochemically verified abstinence from alcohol and other substances.
AB - Background: Missing data are common in tobacco studies. It is well known that from the observed data alone, it is impossible to distinguish between missing mechanisms such as missing at random (MAR) and missing not at random (MNAR). In this paper, we propose a sensitivity analysis method to accommodate different missing mechanisms in cessation outcomes determined by self-report and urine validation results. Methods: We propose a two-stage imputation procedure, allowing survey and urine data to be missing under different mechanisms. The motivating data were from a tobacco cessation trial examining the effects of the extended vs. standard Quit and Win contests and counseling vs. no counseling under a 2-by-2 factorial design. The primary outcome was 6-month biochemically verified tobacco abstinence. Results: Our proposed method covers a wide spectrum of missing scenarios, including the widely adopted "missing = smoking" imputation by assuming a perfect smoking-missing correlation (an extreme case of MNAR), the MAR case by assuming a zero smoking-missing correlation, and many more in between. The analysis of the data example shows that the estimated effects of the studied interventions are sensitive to the different missing assumptions on the survey and urine data. Conclusions: Sensitivity analysis has played a crucial role in assessing the robustness of the findings in clinical trials with missing data. The proposed method provides an effective tool for analyzing missing data introduced at two different stages of outcome assessment, the self-report and validation time. Our methods are applicable to trials studying biochemically verified abstinence from alcohol and other substances.
KW - Abstinence outcome
KW - Imputation
KW - Missing data
KW - Sensitivity analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058817766&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058817766&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12874-018-0635-2
DO - 10.1186/s12874-018-0635-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 30563473
AN - SCOPUS:85058817766
SN - 1471-2288
VL - 18
JO - BMC Medical Research Methodology
JF - BMC Medical Research Methodology
IS - 1
M1 - 170
ER -