TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of arm function in stroke patients
T2 - Rivermead motor assessment arm section revised with Rasch analysis
AU - Van de Winckel, Ann
AU - Feys, Hilde
AU - Lincoln, Nadina
AU - De Weerdt, Willy
PY - 2007/5
Y1 - 2007/5
N2 - Objective: To investigate the construct validity and unidimensionality of the Rivermead Motor Assessment, arm section, using Rasch analysis which transforms the ordinal scale into an interval scale with hierarchical ordering of items. Setting: Twelve stroke units and rehabilitation centres across Belgium, Germany and Switzerland. Subjects: Two hundred fifty-two stroke patients, average (SD) age of 63.5 (13.22) years. Main measures: Principal component analysis on the Rasch data gave additional information on unidimensionality. Differential item functioning established the stability of items for gender, age, country, hemiplegic side, stroke type, and time since stroke. Results Four items did not meet the requirements for the Rasch model and were removed. These were 'Lying, protract shoulder with arm in elevation', 'Pick up tennis ball from table, release on midthigh, return to table, release', 'Same exercise with pencil' and 'Pick up piece of paper from table. Release five times'. Principal component analysis of the remaining 11 items revealed two dimensions in the scale, 'static and dynamic control of movement', and 'coordination'. All items were stable among the subgroups of the sample. Conclusion: The Rivermead Motor Assessment, revised arm section meets the required criteria for validity and unidimensionality. It consists of 11 individual items, which yield two subtotals of overall upper limb ability of the patients. It is a valid tool to evaluate upper limb function after stroke.
AB - Objective: To investigate the construct validity and unidimensionality of the Rivermead Motor Assessment, arm section, using Rasch analysis which transforms the ordinal scale into an interval scale with hierarchical ordering of items. Setting: Twelve stroke units and rehabilitation centres across Belgium, Germany and Switzerland. Subjects: Two hundred fifty-two stroke patients, average (SD) age of 63.5 (13.22) years. Main measures: Principal component analysis on the Rasch data gave additional information on unidimensionality. Differential item functioning established the stability of items for gender, age, country, hemiplegic side, stroke type, and time since stroke. Results Four items did not meet the requirements for the Rasch model and were removed. These were 'Lying, protract shoulder with arm in elevation', 'Pick up tennis ball from table, release on midthigh, return to table, release', 'Same exercise with pencil' and 'Pick up piece of paper from table. Release five times'. Principal component analysis of the remaining 11 items revealed two dimensions in the scale, 'static and dynamic control of movement', and 'coordination'. All items were stable among the subgroups of the sample. Conclusion: The Rivermead Motor Assessment, revised arm section meets the required criteria for validity and unidimensionality. It consists of 11 individual items, which yield two subtotals of overall upper limb ability of the patients. It is a valid tool to evaluate upper limb function after stroke.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447569509&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447569509&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0269215507071783
DO - 10.1177/0269215507071783
M3 - Article
C2 - 17613569
AN - SCOPUS:34447569509
SN - 0269-2155
VL - 21
SP - 471
EP - 479
JO - Clinical Rehabilitation
JF - Clinical Rehabilitation
IS - 5
ER -