Comment on Lidz and associates' critique of the Danish-American studies of the offspring of schizophrenic patients

W. M. Grove

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The author replies to a critique by Lidz and associates of the Greater Copenhagen Adoption Study conducted by Rosenthal and colleagues. A detailed examination of the reanalysis by Lidz and associates of tabulated data from the original adoption study reports substantiates only one of their objections. The author argues that, because of the way in which the original data were gathered, the reanalysis is without substantial merit in evaluating the adoption study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)998-1002
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Psychiatry
Volume140
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1983

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on Lidz and associates' critique of the Danish-American studies of the offspring of schizophrenic patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this