Corridors of clarity: Four principles to overcome uncertainty paralysis in the anthropocene

Stephen Polasky; Anne Sophie Crépin; Reinette Oonsie Biggs; Stephen R. Carpenter; Carl Folke; Garry Peterson; Marten Scheffer; Scott Barrett; Gretchen Daily; Paul Ehrlich; Richard B. Howarth; Terry Hughes; Simon A. Levin; Jason F. Shogren; Max Troell; Brian Walker; Anastasios Xepapadeas

doi:10.1093/biosci/biaa115

Corridors of clarity: Four principles to overcome uncertainty paralysis in the anthropocene

Stephen Polasky, Anne Sophie Crépin, Reinette Oonsie Biggs, Stephen R. Carpenter, Carl Folke, Garry Peterson, Marten Scheffer, Scott Barrett, Gretchen Daily, Paul Ehrlich, Richard B. Howarth, Terry Hughes, Simon A. Levin, Jason F. Shogren, Max Troell, Brian Walker, Anastasios Xepapadeas

Applied Economics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Global environmental change challenges humanity because of its broad scale, long-lasting, and potentially irreversible consequences. Key to an effective response is to use an appropriate scientific lens to peer through the mist of uncertainty that threatens timely and appropriate decisions surrounding these complex issues. Identifying such corridors of clarity could help understanding critical phenomena or causal pathways sufficiently well to justify taking policy action. To this end, we suggest four principles: Follow the strongest and most direct path between policy decisions on outcomes, focus on finding sufficient evidence for policy purpose, prioritize no-regrets policies by avoiding options with controversial, uncertain, or immeasurable benefits, aim for getting the big picture roughly right rather than focusing on details.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1139-1144
Number of pages	6
Journal	BioScience
Volume	70
Issue number	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa115
State	Published - Dec 1 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.

Keywords

Global environmental change
Science-policy interface
Sufficient evidence
Uncertainty

Access

10.1093/biosci/biaa115

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

Polasky, S., Crépin, A. S., Biggs, R. O., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., Peterson, G., Scheffer, M., Barrett, S., Daily, G., Ehrlich, P., Howarth, R. B., Hughes, T., Levin, S. A., Shogren, J. F., Troell, M., Walker, B., & Xepapadeas, A. (2020). Corridors of clarity: Four principles to overcome uncertainty paralysis in the anthropocene. BioScience, 70(12), 1139-1144. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa115

Polasky, S, Crépin, AS, Biggs, RO, Carpenter, SR, Folke, C, Peterson, G, Scheffer, M, Barrett, S, Daily, G, Ehrlich, P, Howarth, RB, Hughes, T, Levin, SA, Shogren, JF, Troell, M, Walker, B & Xepapadeas, A 2020, 'Corridors of clarity: Four principles to overcome uncertainty paralysis in the anthropocene', BioScience, vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 1139-1144. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa115

@article{99cbe2626ddf4a53be62648a3d3c1ec2,

title = "Corridors of clarity: Four principles to overcome uncertainty paralysis in the anthropocene",

abstract = "Global environmental change challenges humanity because of its broad scale, long-lasting, and potentially irreversible consequences. Key to an effective response is to use an appropriate scientific lens to peer through the mist of uncertainty that threatens timely and appropriate decisions surrounding these complex issues. Identifying such corridors of clarity could help understanding critical phenomena or causal pathways sufficiently well to justify taking policy action. To this end, we suggest four principles: Follow the strongest and most direct path between policy decisions on outcomes, focus on finding sufficient evidence for policy purpose, prioritize no-regrets policies by avoiding options with controversial, uncertain, or immeasurable benefits, aim for getting the big picture roughly right rather than focusing on details.",

keywords = "Global environmental change, Science-policy interface, Sufficient evidence, Uncertainty",

author = "Stephen Polasky and Cr{\'e}pin, {Anne Sophie} and Biggs, {Reinette Oonsie} and Carpenter, {Stephen R.} and Carl Folke and Garry Peterson and Marten Scheffer and Scott Barrett and Gretchen Daily and Paul Ehrlich and Howarth, {Richard B.} and Terry Hughes and Levin, {Simon A.} and Shogren, {Jason F.} and Max Troell and Brian Walker and Anastasios Xepapadeas",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2020.",

year = "2020",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1093/biosci/biaa115",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "70",

pages = "1139--1144",

journal = "BioScience",

issn = "0006-3568",

publisher = "American Institute of Biological Sciences",

number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corridors of clarity

T2 - Four principles to overcome uncertainty paralysis in the anthropocene

AU - Polasky, Stephen

AU - Crépin, Anne Sophie

AU - Biggs, Reinette Oonsie

AU - Carpenter, Stephen R.

AU - Folke, Carl

AU - Peterson, Garry

AU - Scheffer, Marten

AU - Barrett, Scott

AU - Daily, Gretchen

AU - Ehrlich, Paul

AU - Howarth, Richard B.

AU - Hughes, Terry

AU - Levin, Simon A.

AU - Shogren, Jason F.

AU - Troell, Max

AU - Walker, Brian

AU - Xepapadeas, Anastasios

PY - 2020/12/1

Y1 - 2020/12/1

N2 - Global environmental change challenges humanity because of its broad scale, long-lasting, and potentially irreversible consequences. Key to an effective response is to use an appropriate scientific lens to peer through the mist of uncertainty that threatens timely and appropriate decisions surrounding these complex issues. Identifying such corridors of clarity could help understanding critical phenomena or causal pathways sufficiently well to justify taking policy action. To this end, we suggest four principles: Follow the strongest and most direct path between policy decisions on outcomes, focus on finding sufficient evidence for policy purpose, prioritize no-regrets policies by avoiding options with controversial, uncertain, or immeasurable benefits, aim for getting the big picture roughly right rather than focusing on details.

AB - Global environmental change challenges humanity because of its broad scale, long-lasting, and potentially irreversible consequences. Key to an effective response is to use an appropriate scientific lens to peer through the mist of uncertainty that threatens timely and appropriate decisions surrounding these complex issues. Identifying such corridors of clarity could help understanding critical phenomena or causal pathways sufficiently well to justify taking policy action. To this end, we suggest four principles: Follow the strongest and most direct path between policy decisions on outcomes, focus on finding sufficient evidence for policy purpose, prioritize no-regrets policies by avoiding options with controversial, uncertain, or immeasurable benefits, aim for getting the big picture roughly right rather than focusing on details.

KW - Global environmental change

KW - Science-policy interface

KW - Sufficient evidence

KW - Uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099392606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85099392606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/biosci/biaa115

DO - 10.1093/biosci/biaa115

M3 - Article

C2 - 33376456

AN - SCOPUS:85099392606

SN - 0006-3568

VL - 70

SP - 1139

EP - 1144

JO - BioScience

JF - BioScience

IS - 12

ER -

Corridors of clarity: Four principles to overcome uncertainty paralysis in the anthropocene

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access

OpenUrl availability

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this