Effectiveness of denitrifying bioreactors on water pollutant reduction from agricultural areas

Laura E. Christianson, Richard A. Cooke, Christopher H. Hay, Matthew J. Helmers, Gary W. Feyereisen, Andry Z. Ranaivoson, John T. McMaine, Rachel McDaniel, Timothy R. Rosen, William T. Pluer, Louis A. Schipper, Hannah Dougherty, Rhianna J. Robinson, Ian A. Layden, Stuart M. Irvine-Brown, Fabio Manca, Kris Dhaese, Victoria Nelissen, Mathis von Ahnen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Denitrifying bioreactors enhance the natural process of denitrification in a practical way to treat nitrate-nitrogen (N) in a variety of N-laden water matrices. The design and construction of bioreactors for treatment of subsurface drainage in the U.S. is guided by USDA-NRCS Conservation Practice Standard 605. This review consolidates the state of the science for denitrifying bioreactors using case studies from across the globe with an emphasis on full-size bioreactor nitrate-N removal and cost-effectiveness. The focus is on bed-style bioreactors (including in-ditch modifications), although there is mention of denitrifying walls, which broaden the applicability of bioreactor technology in some areas. Subsurface drainage denitrifying bioreactors have been assessed as removing 20% to 40% of annual nitrate-N loss in the Midwest, and an evaluation across the peer-reviewed literature published over the past three years showed that bioreactors around the world have been generally consistent with that (N load reduction median: 46%; mean ±SD: 40% ±26%; n = 15). Reported N removal rates were on the order of 5.1 g N m-3 d-1 (median; mean ±SD: 7.2 ±9.6 g N m-3 d-1; n = 27). Subsurface drainage bioreactor installation costs have ranged from less than $5,000 to $27,000, with estimated cost efficiencies ranging from less than $2.50 kg-1 N year-1 to roughly $20 kg-1 N year-1 (although they can be as high as $48 kg-1 N year-1). A suggested monitoring setup is described primarily for the context of conservation practitioners and watershed groups for assessing annual nitrate-N load removal performance of subsurface drainage denitrifying bioreactors. Recommended minimum reporting measures for assessing and comparing annual N removal performance include: bioreactor dimensions and installation date; fill media size, porosity, and type; nitrate-N concentrations and water temperatures; bioreactor flow treatment details; basic drainage system and bioreactor design characteristics; and N removal rate and efficiency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)641-658
Number of pages18
JournalTransactions of the ASABE
Volume64
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The first author gratefully acknowledges funding and support from USDA Hatch Project ILLU-802-925 and Project NR185A12XXXXC004 CESU under Great Rivers Umbrella Agreement 68-3A75-18-504 (USDA-NRCS). The third author was funded by the soybean checkoff through the Iowa Soybean Association.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Groundwater
  • Nitrate
  • Nonpoint-source pollution
  • Subsurface drainage
  • Tile

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of denitrifying bioreactors on water pollutant reduction from agricultural areas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this