Elevated CO2 does not increase eucalypt forest productivity on a low-phosphorus soil

David S. Ellsworth, Ian C. Anderson, Kristine Y. Crous, Julia Cooke, John E. Drake, Andrew N. Gherlenda, Teresa E. Gimeno, Catriona A. Macdonald, Belinda E. Medlyn, Jeff R. Powell, Mark G. Tjoelker, Peter B. Reich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

77 Scopus citations

Abstract

Rising atmospheric CO2 stimulates photosynthesis and productivity of forests, offsetting CO2 emissions. Elevated CO2 experiments in temperate planted forests yielded ∼23% increases in productivity over the initial years. Whether similar CO2 stimulation occurs in mature evergreen broadleaved forests on low-phosphorus (P) soils is unknown, largely due to lack of experimental evidence. This knowledge gap creates major uncertainties in future climate projections as a large part of the tropics is P-limited. Here, we increased atmospheric CO2 concentration in a mature broadleaved evergreen eucalypt forest for three years, in the first large-scale experiment on a P-limited site. We show that tree growth and other aboveground productivity components did not significantly increase in response to elevated CO2 in three years, despite a sustained 19% increase in leaf photosynthesis. Moreover, tree growth in ambient CO2 was strongly P-limited and increased by ∼35% with added phosphorus. The findings suggest that P availability may potentially constrain CO2 -enhanced productivity in P-limited forests; hence, future atmospheric CO2 trajectories may be higher than predicted by some models. As a result, coupled climate-carbon models should incorporate both nitrogen and phosphorus limitations to vegetation productivity in estimating future carbon sinks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)279-282
Number of pages4
JournalNature Climate Change
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
EucFACE was built as an initiative of the Australian Government as part of the Nation-building Economic Stimulus Package, and is supported by the Australian Commonwealth in collaboration with Western Sydney University. A portion of this work was supported by grants from the Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery grants scheme, particularly DP110105102 and DP160102452. K.Y.C. acknowledges ARC support (DECRA program), and T.E.G. acknowledges the CSIRO and a Marie S. Curie IEF Fellowship.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Elevated CO<sub>2</sub> does not increase eucalypt forest productivity on a low-phosphorus soil'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this