Establishing the definition and inter-rater reliability of cortical silent period calculation in subjects with focal hand dystonia and healthy controls

Teresa J Kimberley, PT,, Michael R. Borich, Kristina D. Prochaska, Shannon L. Mundfrom, Ariel E. Perkins, Joseph M. Poepping

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe a clearly defined manual method for calculating cortical silent period (CSP) length that can be employed successfully and reliably by raters after minimal training in subjects with focal hand dystonia (FHD) and healthy subjects. A secondary purpose was to explore intra-subject variability of the CSP in subjects with FHD vs. healthy subjects. Two raters previously naïve to CSP identification and one experienced rater independently analyzed 170 CSP measurements collected in 6 subjects with focal hand dystonia (FHD) and 9 healthy subjects. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to quantify inter-rater reliability within the two groups of subjects. The relative variability of CSP in each group was calculated by the coefficient of variation (CV). Relative variation between raters within repeated measures of individual subjects was also quantified by CV. Reliability measures were as follows-mean of three raters: all subjects: ICC = 0.976; within healthy subjects: ICC = 0.965; in subjects with FHD: ICC = 0.956. The median within-subject variability for the healthy group was CV = 7.33% and in subjects with FHD:CV = 11.78%. The median variability of calculating individual subject CSP duration between raters was CV = 10.23% in subjects with dystonia and CV = 10.46% in healthy subjects. Manual calculation of CSP results in excellent reliability between raters of varied levels of experience. Healthy subjects display less variability in CSP. Despite greater variability, the CSP in impaired subjects can be reliably calculated across raters.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)84-87
Number of pages4
JournalNeuroscience Letters
Volume464
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 23 2009

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work is supported, in part, by M01-RR00400 National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health and by the Dystonia Medical Research Foundation. We would like to thank Dr. Richard DiFabio for his statistical advice.

Keywords

  • Cortical excitability
  • Cortical silent period
  • Definition
  • Focal hand dystonia
  • Methodology
  • Reliability
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Establishing the definition and inter-rater reliability of cortical silent period calculation in subjects with focal hand dystonia and healthy controls'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this