TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of Negation in Stems of Multiple-Choice Items
AU - Harasym, P. H.
AU - Price, P. G.
AU - Brant, R.
AU - Violato, C.
AU - Lorscheider, F. L.
PY - 1992/6
Y1 - 1992/6
N2 - The opinion of some test experts is that negation (e.g., not, except) should be used sparingly or avoided in the stems of multiplechoice items. In these items, examinees are required to select the one alternative that is false from among those that are true. However, negation continues to be used and frequently accounts for 15-20% of the multiple-choice items within a given medical examination. A 90-item multiple-choice examination was administered in various formats to approximately 200 nursing students in each of two consecutive academic years. The findings of the present study provide evidence that the use of negation in stems should be limited and that the single-response, negatively worded (SRNW) item should often be converted to a multiple-response, positively worded (MRPW) item. This recommendation is based on the inherent cuing (ie., eliminating some alternatives by comparative deduction) within SRNW items and on an increase in the reliability and concurrent validity of MRPW test scores.
AB - The opinion of some test experts is that negation (e.g., not, except) should be used sparingly or avoided in the stems of multiplechoice items. In these items, examinees are required to select the one alternative that is false from among those that are true. However, negation continues to be used and frequently accounts for 15-20% of the multiple-choice items within a given medical examination. A 90-item multiple-choice examination was administered in various formats to approximately 200 nursing students in each of two consecutive academic years. The findings of the present study provide evidence that the use of negation in stems should be limited and that the single-response, negatively worded (SRNW) item should often be converted to a multiple-response, positively worded (MRPW) item. This recommendation is based on the inherent cuing (ie., eliminating some alternatives by comparative deduction) within SRNW items and on an increase in the reliability and concurrent validity of MRPW test scores.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026741063&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026741063&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/016327879201500205
DO - 10.1177/016327879201500205
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0026741063
SN - 0163-2787
VL - 15
SP - 198
EP - 220
JO - Evaluation & the Health Professions
JF - Evaluation & the Health Professions
IS - 2
ER -