Explaining variation in teaching practices? Effects of state policy, teacher background, and curricula in Southern Africa

Bruce Fuller, Conrad W. Snyder, David Chapman, Haiyan Hua

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

State actors assume that central policies and interventions can penetrate the classroom to effectively change teaching practices (an open-systems framework). Empirical research in the West, however, has illuminated how inventive school actors can often buffer policy makers' attempts to modify pedagogical scripts and routines followed by teachers (an institutional framework). This paper steps outside of Europe and the U.S.A. to first examine how much "natural variation" exists in teaching practices among schools within one post-colonial African nation: Botswana. Then, we assess whether policy-manipulable features of the school organization are related to the limited range of pedagogical variation observed. We find that individual background characteristics of teachers, linked to selection policies, hold little relationship to pedagogical practices. In contrast, the subject being taught, teacher training, and textbook use all help to explain several teaching behaviors, with the latter tending to reduce the complexity of instruction within the Botswana context.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)141-156
Number of pages16
JournalTeaching and Teacher Education
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1994

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
1 This paper stems from the Botswana Teacher, Classroom and AchievementS tudy, supported by the Botswana government and the U.S. Agency for International Development. We thank John W. Meyer for comments on an earlier draft.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Explaining variation in teaching practices? Effects of state policy, teacher background, and curricula in Southern Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this