First observation of the exclusive decays Λc +→Λ π+ π+ π- π0 and Λc+Λ ωπ+

D. Cronin-Hennessy, A. L. Lyon, C. S. Park, W. Park, J. B. Thayer, E. H. Thorndike, T. E. Coan, Y. S. Gao, F. Liu, Y. Maravin, R. Stroynowski, M. Artuso, C. Boulahouache, S. Blusk, K. Bukin, E. Dambasuren, R. Mountain, G. C. Moneti, H. Muramatsu, R. NandakumarT. Skwarnicki, S. Stone, J. C. Wang, A. H. Mahmood, S. E. Csorna, I. Danko, G. Bonvicini, D. Cinabro, M. Dubrovin, S. McGee, A. Bornheim, E. Lipeles, S. P. Pappas, A. Shapiro, W. M. Sun, A. J. Weinstein, R. A. Briere, G. P. Chen, T. Ferguson, G. Tatishvili, H. Vogel, N. E. Adam, J. P. Alexander, K. Berkelman, V. Boisvert, D. G. Cassel, P. S. Drell, J. E. Duboscq, K. M. Ecklund, R. Ehrlich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Using data collected by the CLEO III detector at CESR, we report on the first observation of the decays Λc+→Λ π+ π+ π- π0 and Λc+→Λ ωπ+. The branching fractions are measured relative to the pK- π+ mode; we find B(Λc+→Λ π+ π+ π- π0)/B(Lambda;c +→pK- π+) = 0.36±0.09(stat) ±0.09(syst) and B(Λc+→Λ ωπ+)/B(Λc+→pK- π+) = 0.24±0.06(stat)±0.06(syst). We also observe a small excess of events in Λc+→Λ ηπ+, η→π+ π- π0 from which we find B(Λc +→Λ ηπ+)/B(Λc +→pK- π+) = 0.41±0.17±0. 10 with a corresponding limit of <0.65% at 90% confidence level. This rate is consistent with previous measurements of Λc +→Λ ηπ+, η-γ γ. We find that the combined branching fractions for Λc +→Lambda; ωπ+ and Λc +→Λπ+ π+ π- π0)B(Λc+ comprise (87±13) of the total Λ rate. We set an upper limit on B(Λc +→Λπ+ π+ π- 0)/BΛc+→pK- π+ for non-ω and non-η modes of 0.13 at 90% confidence level.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number012001
JournalPhysical Review D
Volume67
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'First observation of the exclusive decays Λ<sub>c</sub> <sup>+</sup>→Λ π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>+</sup> π<sup>-</sup> π<sup>0</sup> and Λ<sub>c</sub><sup>+</sup>Λ ωπ<sup>+</sup>'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this