Impact of bloodstream infection on outcomes among infected surgical inpatients

D. P. Raymond, S. J. Pelletier, T. D. Crabtree, T. G. Gleason, T. L. Pruett, R. G. Sawyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To assess the importance of bloodstream infection (BSI) to outcomes among infected surgical patients. Background: Bloodstream infection complicating infection is thought to connote a more serious condition compared with a primary infection alone. The authors recently reported, however, that BSI does not alter outcomes with central venous catheter colonization in the presence of sepsis. The significance of BSI with other infections has been incompletely evaluated. Methods: Data on all episodes of infection among surgical patients were collected prospectively during a 38-month period at a single hospital, then analyzed retrospectively to determine the independent prognostic value of BSI for all infections by logistic regression analysis, and for abdominal infections and pneumonia using matched control groups. Results: During the study period, 2,076 episodes of infection occurred, including 363 with BSI. Patients with BSI had a greater severity of illness and a greater death rate. After logistic regression, however, BSI did not independently predict death. After matching patients with abdominal infections and pneumonia with BSI to patients without BSI but with a similar site of infection, severity of illness, age, and causative organism, no difference in outcome was seen. Conclusions: Bloodstream infection is associated with critical illness and death but appears to be a marker of severe primary disease rather than an independent predictor of outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)549-555
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of surgery
Volume233
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of bloodstream infection on outcomes among infected surgical inpatients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this