Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | vi-vii |
Journal | Military medicine |
Volume | 177 |
Issue number | 8 |
State | Published - Aug 2012 |
In response to: "The ANAM lacks utility as a diagnostic or screening tool for concussion more than 10 days following injury," published in the February issue (mil med 2011; 177(2): 179-83).
Robert L. Kane, Victoria Tepe, James Ness, Stephen Grate
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review