TY - JOUR
T1 - Is a little bit of sex as good as a lot?
AU - Green, Richard F.
AU - Noakes, David L.G.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1995
Y1 - 1995
N2 - Few of the costs and benefits that have been suggested for sex can be measured quantitatively. One cost which can be measured is the cost of producing males (or the “50% loss due to meiosis”). Some animals avoid much of this cost by reproducing asexually most of the time, but occasionally reproducing sexually. Others avoid the cost through regular self-fertilization, occasionally interrupted by outcrossing. Models show that these savings may be had with little loss in benefits. In particular, for some models which show that evolution is faster with sexual than with asexual reproduction, the rate of evolution is nearly as fast when only a fraction of reproduction is sexual and the rest is asexual. We describe two such models in detail. One is the segregation model of Kirkpatrick and Jenkins, which was modified to apply to facultative sexuality by Hedrick and Whittam. The other is the recombination model of Eshel and Feldman, which we modify to apply to facultative sexuality. We give some examples that illustrate a variety of ways in which animals may reduce the effort devoted to producing males, or to sexual reproduction. While some examples are clear and well known, others are less clear and deserve further study.
AB - Few of the costs and benefits that have been suggested for sex can be measured quantitatively. One cost which can be measured is the cost of producing males (or the “50% loss due to meiosis”). Some animals avoid much of this cost by reproducing asexually most of the time, but occasionally reproducing sexually. Others avoid the cost through regular self-fertilization, occasionally interrupted by outcrossing. Models show that these savings may be had with little loss in benefits. In particular, for some models which show that evolution is faster with sexual than with asexual reproduction, the rate of evolution is nearly as fast when only a fraction of reproduction is sexual and the rest is asexual. We describe two such models in detail. One is the segregation model of Kirkpatrick and Jenkins, which was modified to apply to facultative sexuality by Hedrick and Whittam. The other is the recombination model of Eshel and Feldman, which we modify to apply to facultative sexuality. We give some examples that illustrate a variety of ways in which animals may reduce the effort devoted to producing males, or to sexual reproduction. While some examples are clear and well known, others are less clear and deserve further study.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028988783&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028988783&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/jtbi.1995.0081
DO - 10.1006/jtbi.1995.0081
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0028988783
SN - 0022-5193
VL - 174
SP - 87
EP - 96
JO - Journal of Theoretical Biology
JF - Journal of Theoretical Biology
IS - 1
ER -