Long-term oscillations in grassland productivity induced by drought

Nick M. Haddad, David Tilman, Johannes M.H. Knops

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

96 Scopus citations

Abstract

Disturbances such as drought have immediate impacts on ecosystem functioning, but little is known about long-term dynamic consequences of disturbance. Here, we show that a major drought perturbed prairie grassland from nearly constant average annual production, and induced 9 years of oscillations with a 2-year period. This pattern occurred in unmanipulated plots in many widely separated fields that were part of two different long-term studies. Using direct and indirect tests, we could reject the hypothesis that the oscillations were externally imposed by climate or herbivores. Weak evidence supported the hypothesis that oscillations were internally generated, caused by a litter and nitrogen dependent feedback on productivity. This hypothesis was supported by the results of two other long-term studies, in which burning and, separately, nitrogen addition eliminated the 2-year oscillations in plant production. However, more direct evidence failed to support the litter hypothesis. A final, but untested hypothesis was suggested by the observation that production tended to be synchronized amongst dominant plants. Drought may have synchronized production dynamics amongst plants with biennially greater allocation to above-ground growth. Regardless of the specific mechanism, our results show that a single disturbance may have long-lasting effects on the dynamics of plant production.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)110-120
Number of pages11
JournalEcology letters
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Keywords

  • ANPP
  • Community dynamics
  • Disturbance
  • Drought
  • Litter
  • Long-term research
  • Nitrogen
  • Oscillations
  • Primary production
  • Synchronous production

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term oscillations in grassland productivity induced by drought'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this