Premature ejaculation: A psychophysiological review

Michael E. Metz, Jon L. Pryor, Leon J. Nesvacil, Faruk Abuzzahab, Jan Koznar

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

96 Scopus citations

Abstract

This review examines the most common male sexual dysfunction, premature ejaculation (PE). The prevalence, classification, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and psychological studies that offer evidence useful for understanding and clinically evaluating PE are reviewed. It is proposed that there are two basic kinds of PE: Biogenic and psychogenic. Studies reporting pharmacological aspects of ejaculation offer some suggestions regarding the mechanisms of ejaculation as well as possible pharmacologic aid for some premature ejaculators. The traditional assumption among sex therapists that PE is almost universally caused by psychological features, and easily treated with sex therapy behavioral techniques, is drawn into question. Based on the limited available results from systematic investigations, behavioral treatments for PE remain beneficial to only a minority of men three years after treatment ends, suggesting that this male dysfunction is difficult to treat effectively. The mediocre results reported in treatment outcome studies may be due, in part, to reports on heterogeneous groups of premature ejaculators, for whom treatment has been generalized rather than targeted to the specific type of PE. We propose a biological and psychological etiology. With more discriminating assessment and more specific diagnosis of PE, and with treatment designed to address the particular type of PE, long-term outcome should improve for this common sexual dysfunction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-23
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Sex and Marital Therapy
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Premature ejaculation: A psychophysiological review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this