Reform and Electoral Competition: Convergence Toward Equity in Latin American Health Sectors

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Scholars of Latin America disagree about the effects on equity of social policy reforms of the 1980s and 1990s. Those who see negative or no effects blame reforms, while those who believe welfare regimes have become more equitable attribute the change not to reform but to democracy and left governance. I resolve this disagreement by first developing a more holistic measure of equity. With this measure, I establish a convergence toward equity in the health sectors of Brazil, Colombia, and Chile. I then process-trace to determine the causal factors behind this convergence. Paradoxically, I find that the reform period was crucial because it gave rise to an alliance between technocrats and politicians facing electoral competition who together succeeded in overturning preexisting policy legacies, paving the way for equity. Left governance was not a significant factor behind this convergence, while democracy was important but has been underspecified.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)184-218
Number of pages35
JournalComparative Political Studies
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by a Fulbright New Century Scholars Fellowship and a grant from the University of Wisconsin–Madison Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education with funding from the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, © The Author(s) 2015.

Keywords

  • Latin American politics
  • health politics and policy
  • social welfare programs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reform and Electoral Competition: Convergence Toward Equity in Latin American Health Sectors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this