The national children's study: Early recruitment outcomes using the direct outreach approach

Patricia M. McGovern, Nancy M. Nachreiner, Jane L. Holl, Neal Halfon, Dana Dabelea, Laura Caulfield, Jane A. Cauley, Mark S. Innocenti, Laura Amsden, Nina Markovic, Minsun Riddles, Sara Adams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In 2009, the National Children's Study (NCS) Vanguard Study tested the feasibility of household-based recruitment and participant enrollment by using a birth rate probability sample. In 2010, the NCS Program Office launched 3 alternative recruitment methods. We tested whether direct outreach (DO) recruitment could be a more efficient strategy to recruit women of child-bearing age. METHODS: The NCS DO recruitment approach recruited women, 18 to 49 years, who were pregnant or trying to conceive using passive recruitment methods emphasizing broad community outreach and engagement to create study awareness. Study mailings to listed households included a pregnancy screening questionnaire to identify potentially eligible women from selected neighborhoods to contact the study center. Unique features of this recruitment approach included the following: (1) expansion of selected neighborhoods to maximize potential participant recruitment and enrollment while minimizing in-person participant contact and (2) offering 2 levels of study participation distinguished by data collection intensity. RESULTS: Ten study centers listed 255 475 geographically eligible households for contact representing, on average, 3.3% of households per Primary Sampling Unit. A total of 19 354 women were identified for screening, and 17 421 completed a pregnancy screener representing 6.8% of eligible households. Study-eligible pregnant women were older, more educated, and less likely to be Hispanic than the general population. Only 16% (2786) of 17 421 screened women were study-eligible, and 81.1% of these 2786 women consented to participate. CONCLUSIONS: Although feasible, the DO approach recruited a sample of study-eligible pregnant women significantly different from the population. This recruitment approach was labor intensive for the yield of enrolled women.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S231-S238
JournalPediatrics
Volume137
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2016

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The analysis was conducted as part of the National Children's Study, supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and funded, through its appropriation, by the Office of the Director of the National Institutes of Health. Supported in part by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development contracts numbers HHSN275200800024C, HHSN27520080033C, HHSN267200700027C, HHSN275200800010C, HHSN267200700017C, HHSN275200800018C, HHSN267200700022C, HHSN267200700029C, HHSN267200700015C, and HHSN275200800004C. Funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The national children's study: Early recruitment outcomes using the direct outreach approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this