Trends in use of marijuana and attitudes toward marijuana among youth before and after decriminalization: The case of California 2007-2013

Richard A. Miech, Lloyd Johnston, Patrick M. O'Malley, Jerald G. Bachman, John Schulenberg, Megan E. Patrick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

116 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: This analysis examines decriminalization as a risk factor for future increases in youth marijuana acceptance and use. Specifically, we examine marijuana-related behaviors and attitudes of 8th, 10th, and 12th graders in California as compared to other U.S. states during the years before and after California passed legislation in 2010 to decriminalize marijuana. Methods: Data come from Monitoring the Future, an annual, nationally representative survey of 8th, 10th, and 12th grade students. Results: In 2012 and afterwards California 12th graders as compared to their peers in other states became (a) 25% more likely to have used marijuana in the past 30 days, (b) 20% less likely to perceive regular marijuana use as a great health risk, (c) 20% less likely to strongly disapprove of regular marijuana use, and (d) about 60% more likely to expect to be using marijuana five years in the future. Analysis of 10th graders raises the possibility that the findings among 12th graders may reflect a cohort effect that was set into place two years earlier. Conclusion: These results provide empirical evidence to support concerns that decriminalization may be a risk factor for future increases in youth marijuana use and acceptance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)336-344
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Drug Policy
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier B.V.

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Decriminalization
  • Marijuana

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trends in use of marijuana and attitudes toward marijuana among youth before and after decriminalization: The case of California 2007-2013'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this