Whatever Happened to Human Experimentation?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Several years ago, the University of Minnesota hosted a lecture by Alan Milstein, a Philadelphia attorney specializing in clinical trial litigation. Milstein, who does not mince words, insisted on calling research studies "experiments." "Don't call it a study," Milstein said. "Don't call it a clinical trial. Call it what it is. It's an experiment." Milstein's comments made me wonder: when was the last time I heard an ongoing research study described as a "human experiment"? The phrase is now almost always associated with abuses. Asking a prospective subject to sign up for a medical experiment would probably get roughly the same response as asking him or her to sign up for a police interrogation. It wasn't always this way. In the early days of American bioethics, scholars used the word "experimentation" in the same neutral way that they later began to use "research study" and "clinical trial."

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8-11
Number of pages4
JournalHastings Center Report
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Hastings Center.

Copyright:
Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Whatever Happened to Human Experimentation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this