TY - JOUR
T1 - Why does reading speed decrease when text has randomly rotated letters
AU - Ortiz, A.
AU - Mansfield, J. S.
AU - Legge, G. E.
PY - 1997/12/1
Y1 - 1997/12/1
N2 - Purpose. Reading speeds drop to 33% of maximum when letters within the text are randomly oriented |Ortiz etui., ARVO 1996). One explanation is that letter recognition in reading is orientation dependent, but it is also possible that the speed reduction is due lo confusions from a suhset of letters that resemble other letters when rotated. We tested the latter explanation. Method. First, a letter-recognition experiment was conducted to identify which letters were most confusable when orientation was randomized. Confusion matrices were constructed from recognition responses to randomly oriented, individual letters. In a second experiment, two lists of words (equated tor word frequency) were generated: lisl A had words containing only the 10 most confusable letters, and list B had words containing only the 10 least-confusable letters. Reading speeds for random sentences of \vords from lists A and B were compared in two conditions: with letters in their normal orientation, and with randomly oriented letters. Results. When randomly oriented, the 10 most confusable letters were [q d u k p be w 1 a]. Reading speeds for words containing these letters dropped to 19% of maximum. The 10 least confusable letters were [e g s o m I i z x h]. Reading speeds for words containing these letters dropped to 33<7<- of maximum, similar to our previous findings for text composed of all 26 letters. Conclusions. Texts that contain a high density of rotationally confusable letters are harder to read when the letters are rotated. But even when these letters arc entirely excluded, reading speeds show a strong effect of random lelter rotation. These results support the concept of an orientation-specific mechanism for letter recognition in reading.
AB - Purpose. Reading speeds drop to 33% of maximum when letters within the text are randomly oriented |Ortiz etui., ARVO 1996). One explanation is that letter recognition in reading is orientation dependent, but it is also possible that the speed reduction is due lo confusions from a suhset of letters that resemble other letters when rotated. We tested the latter explanation. Method. First, a letter-recognition experiment was conducted to identify which letters were most confusable when orientation was randomized. Confusion matrices were constructed from recognition responses to randomly oriented, individual letters. In a second experiment, two lists of words (equated tor word frequency) were generated: lisl A had words containing only the 10 most confusable letters, and list B had words containing only the 10 least-confusable letters. Reading speeds for random sentences of \vords from lists A and B were compared in two conditions: with letters in their normal orientation, and with randomly oriented letters. Results. When randomly oriented, the 10 most confusable letters were [q d u k p be w 1 a]. Reading speeds for words containing these letters dropped to 19% of maximum. The 10 least confusable letters were [e g s o m I i z x h]. Reading speeds for words containing these letters dropped to 33<7<- of maximum, similar to our previous findings for text composed of all 26 letters. Conclusions. Texts that contain a high density of rotationally confusable letters are harder to read when the letters are rotated. But even when these letters arc entirely excluded, reading speeds show a strong effect of random lelter rotation. These results support the concept of an orientation-specific mechanism for letter recognition in reading.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749194476&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749194476&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33749194476
SN - 0146-0404
VL - 38
SP - S648
JO - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
JF - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
IS - 4
ER -